Inside Trademarks Trademark Analytics, Research & Strategy

22Mar/101

An Understanding of Keyword Advertising and Trademarks is Critical to Internet Marketing Success (Part IV)


Part IV, the final excerpt in the series from the upcoming Inside Trademarks™ Keyword Advertising Guide (2010)

Steps Your Business Can Take To Protect Its Brand Now 

Many business and marketing executives regard unauthorized use of their company's brands and trademarks as keywords as a source of lost revenue.  As a company becomes more successful in its industry, its brand names and trademarks become more valuable as PPC search terms.

That increase in value is not lost on competitors, and in many cases, they will bid on keywords related to another company's trademarks so that they can interact with customers who originally intended to purchase from the other company. This results in a situation where the company that owns a popular or emerging brand can lose business when Internet consumers go to a competitor's website due to the competitor's keyword ad instead of going the brand-owning company's website. 

So, short of filing a lawsuit, there are some cost-effective steps that your business can take now to protect its brands on the Internet.

1. Use distinctive trademarks. Apply for and register brand names that are distinctive, strong and not merely descriptive. The more distinctive the mark, the more likely your company is to prevail against an infringer. If a mark is a generic description of the product, it can be difficult for your company to take any enforcement action.

2. Contact competitors running PPC ads with your trademark-protected terms. This can be one of the more efficient ways to ensure that your trademarks are removed from all competitive advertising campaigns instead of just one of your competitor's PPC accounts.  Threatening your competitor with legal action if they do not respond to your initial contact is heavy-handed. Inform them, however, that if they do not remove the infringing terms at issue from their PPC campaigns, you will file a trademark complaint against them with the relevant search engine(s) - this can potentially have a negative affect on their accounts. 

Bookmark and Share
21Mar/100

An Understanding of Keyword Advertising and Trademarks is Critical to Internet Marketing Success (Part III)


Part III in a series of excerpts from the upcoming Inside Trademarks™ Advertising Guide (2010).

Trademark Law and Keyword Advertising

A number of trademark infringement cases involving keyword advertising have gone to court over the past decade, however, the courts are still playing catch up when it comes to applying trademark law to keyword advertising.

The courts lag in addressing this issue is not entirely their fault. The majority of keyword advertising cases brought in the U.S. are settled out of court and do not proceed to trial - leaving courts unable to make legal decisions on issues brought in these cases. This has left many unanswered questions on the issue of whether the sale or purchase and use of a trademark as a keyword to trigger Internet advertisements is trademark infringement.

To successfully bring a keyword-based trademark infringement suit, a business has to prove: (1) the infringing use of the trademark as a keyword is a "use in commerce", meaning that the good or service at issue is being sold; (2) the use of the trademark as a keyword has or is likely to confuse typical consumers; and (3) the use of the trademark as a keyword is not protected by any defenses, including license (e.g. permission from the brand owner), nominative fair use (e.g. product comparison), descriptive or generic use, or resale.

So far, courts trend towards ruling that: (1) use of a trademark as a keyword is a "use in commerce", but that use alone is not enough to show likelihood of consumer confusion; and (2) use of a trademark in ad copy is a "use in commerce", but courts must conduct case-by-case analysis in the context of how the advertiser uses the trademark in order to determine whether the use is proper and legitimate, or improper and confusing to consumers. 

Court decisions to date also indicate that brand-owning businesses will need detailed evidence, e.g. surveys based on observation and sampling of how Internet consumers perceive and interact with keyword campaigns based on their trademarks, to show consumer confusion.

Pre-Order the Inside Trademarks™ Advertising Guide (2010) for more insight into how to use developing trends in trademark law to your advantage in keyword advertising campaigns.  See our earlier posts from this series (Part I and Part II).

Bookmark and Share
19Mar/102

Online Game Suit Against Facebook and the Creator of Chain Rxn


Is Chain Rxn Game on Facebook A Clone?

Daniel Miller, the video game designer behind a popular online casual game, Boomshine, recently filed a lawsuit against Facebook and Yao Wei Yeo, of Zwiggler's Apps, the creator of the Chain Rxn game.  Miller alleges that the Chain Rxn game, which is available on Facebook, is an unauthorized flash game clone of his original Boomshine game.

Although Miller first filed suit  in Georgia in October 2009 claiming both trademark and copyright infringement, he just filed an amended complaint alleging only copyright infringement on Wednesday, March 17 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Miller created the flash-based Boomshine game in early 2007 and then published it on the Internet on March 9, 2007.  Since then the game has been played over 70 million times online. He also secured a copyright registration for his game on May 5, 2009.

Chain Rxn first appeared on Facebook in April 2009.  Not long after its debut on the popular social network, Miller noticed Chain Rxn and took issue with the unauthorized cloning of Boomshine on his blog months prior to filing suit. 

It appears that Miller's and others' notices to Facebook and the Chain Rxn creator regarding the cloning of Boomshine went unanswered, and eventually Miller filed the current lawsuit (see amended complaint below). 

Miller claims that Facebook allowed the cloned game, Chain Rxn, to remain on its website even after being notified of  its infringement.  Both Boomshine and Chain Rxn are available on iPhones as well.   

Cloning of casual and social games is an ever growing problem for developers seeking to monetize their games and intellectual property. Research conducted by Inside Trademarks™ Analytics indicates that intellectual property strategy is a significant factor in determining game developers' business success.

Yesterday, the court in San Francisco, CA held a hearing to consider Facebook's motion to dismiss the suit, however the judge has not yet issued a ruling.  Until then, take a look at Boomshine and then Chain Rxn, and make your own comparison.

See our other articles related to online gaming.

Daniel Miller v. Facebook

Bookmark and Share
18Mar/100

An Understanding of Keyword Advertising and Trademarks is Critical to Internet Marketing Success (Part II)


Part II in a series of excerpts from the upcoming Inside Trademarks™ Advertising Guide (2010).

How the Keyword Ad Process Works 

Advertisers purchase or bid on keywords to direct their ads to consumers interested in their products. This targeting of consumers increases the effectiveness of Internet advertising. An advertiser may choose to purchase its competitor's trademark or brand name as a keyword to target consumers seeking the competitor's website or product, and to increase the probability that the advertiser's keyword ad displays in the search results page along with the competitor's web address and link. The diagram below shows an overview of the keyword ad process.

 
 

This process, which now occurs billions of times per day, generates substantial revenue for search engines. Google, in recent litigation with Rescuecom Corp., claimed that about 97% of its revenue comes from services sold through its Adwords program.

Trademarks are often popular and valuable keywords.  Advertisers bid their price up and consumers often enter trademarks in their search queries to find products or services.  Naturally, search engines are incentivized to allow bidding on more popular keywords, such as trademarks, in PPC advertising because it drives more revenue for them.  Although the major search engines do provide procedures for brand owners to address infringement of their brands in keyword advertising, brand owners must rely on their own online branding strategy and trademark law to truly protect their brands on the Internet.

For more information on how to better combine brand and trademark strategy to improve ROI on your keyword ad campaigns, pre-order the Inside Trademarks™ Advertising Guide (2010).  See our earlier post from this series (Part I).

Bookmark and Share